Pass Your NIST-COBIT-2019 Exam Easily – Real NIST-COBIT-2019 Practice Dump Updated May 21, 2024 [Q14-Q35]

NIST-COBIT-2019 ISACA

admin • May 21, 2024

Pass Your NIST-COBIT-2019 Exam Easily – Real NIST-COBIT-2019 Practice Dump Updated May 21, 2024 [Q14-Q35]

Rate this post

Pass Your NIST-COBIT-2019 Exam Easily – Real NIST-COBIT-2019 Practice Dump Updated May 21, 2024

2024 Realistic Verified Free ISACA NIST-COBIT-2019 Exam Questions

QUESTION 14
Which of the following is a KEY activity of COBIT Implementation Phase 2: Where Are We Now?

Identification of applicable compliance requirements

Identification of challenges and success factors

Identification and definition of improvement targets

This is a key activity of COBIT Implementation Phase 2: Where Are We Now?, because it involves assessing the current state of the enterprise’s governance and management system, as well as its strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats12. This activity also includes identifying the relevant stakeholders, drivers, and scope of the implementation program. Therefore, this activity requires a thorough understanding of the external laws, regulations, and contractual obligations that apply to the enterprise and its I&T activities34.
References: 1: COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide 2: COBIT 2019 Implementation – ISACA 3: Compliance with External Requirements – Morland-Austin 4: COBIT 5 : Key Concepts and Principles of COBIT 5 Explained

QUESTION 15
Which of the following should be a PRIMARY consideration when creating an action plan to address gaps identified in CSF Step 6: Determine, Analyze, and Prioritize Gaps?

Mission drivers

Stakeholder map

IT process descriptions

According to the NIST Cybersecurity Framework, mission drivers are a primary consideration when creating an action plan to address gaps identified in CSF Step 6, as they help to align the cybersecurity program with the organization’s objectives, priorities, and risk appetite. Mission drivers also help to determine the resources needed and the cost-benefit analysis of the proposed solutions12.
References7 Steps to Implement & Improve Cybersecurity with NISTCybersecurity Framework v1.1 – CSF Tools – Identity Digital, page 7.

QUESTION 16
How should gaps identified between the current and target profiles be addressed?

Comparing to and acting on the desired Tier level

With a full project engagement to close all gaps

Through a risk based-approach

According to the NIST Cybersecurity Framework, gaps identified between the current and target profiles should be addressed through a risk-based approach, which enables an organization to gauge the resources needed and prioritize the mitigation of gaps in a cost-effective manner. This approach also aligns the cybersecurity program with the business objectives and risk appetite of the organization12.
ReferencesExamples of Framework Profiles | NISTWhat is the NIST Cybersecurity Framework? | IBM

QUESTION 17
During CSF implementation, when is an information security manager MOST likely to identify key enterprise and supporting alignment goals as previously understood?

CSF Steps 5: Create a Target Profile and 6: Determine, Analyze, and Prioritize Gaps

CSF Step 1: Prioritize and Scope

CSF Steps 2: Orient and 3: Create a Current Profile

This CSF step corresponds to the COBIT objective of knowledge and understanding of enterprise goals, because it involves identifying the business drivers, mission, objectives, and risk appetite of the organization, as well as the scope and boundaries of the cybersecurity program12. This step helps to ensure that the cybersecurity activities and outcomes are aligned with the enterprise goals and strategy34.
References: 1: Cybersecurity Framework Components | NIST 2: Implementing the NIST Cybersecurity Framework Using COBIT 2019 | ISACA 3: COBIT 2019 Design and Implementation COBIT Implementation
4: COBIT 2019 Foundation | Skillsoft Global Knowledge

QUESTION 18
The activity of determining an appropriate target capability level for each process occurs within which implementation phase?

Phase 4 – What Needs to Be Done?

Phase 3 – Where Do We Want to Be?

Phase 2 – Where Are We Now?

The activity of determining an appropriate target capability level for each process occurs within Implementation Phase 3, as it helps to set an improvement target and identify gaps and potential solutions using COBIT’s guidance. This involves creating a detailed business case and a high-level program plan for the implementation12.
ReferencesDefining Target Capability Levels in COBIT 2019: A Proposal for RefinementCOBIT 2019 Design and Implementation COBIT Implementation, page 31.

QUESTION 19
Which of the following is associated with the “Detect” core function of the NIST Cybersecurity Framework?

Information Protection Processes and Procedures

Anomalies and Events

Risk Assessment

Anomalies and Events is one of the six categories within the Detect function of the NIST Cybersecurity Framework. The Anomalies and Events category aims to ensure that anomalous activity is detected in a timely manner and the potential impact of events is understood12.
References: 1: The Five Functions | NIST 2: Detect | NIST

QUESTION 20
Which of the following is the MOST beneficial result of an effective CSF implementation plan?

Cybersecurity risk management practices are formalized and institutionalized.

Key stakeholders understand the quick wins of the cybersecurity program.

Key stakeholders understand the cybersecurity requirements of the chosen vendors.

The most beneficial result of an effective CSF implementation plan is that cybersecurity risk management practices are formalized and institutionalized, which means that the organization has established and maintained a consistent and comprehensive approach to managing cybersecurity risks across its systems, processes, and people. This result can help the organization to reduce the likelihood and impact of cybersecurity events, improve its resilience and compliance, and enhance its reputation and trust12.
ReferencesPublic Draft: The NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2, page 1.Cybersecurity Framework | NIST

QUESTION 21
The PRIMARY function of COBIT Implementation Phase 7: How Do We Keep the Momentum Going is to provide an opportunity for which of the following?

Closing the loop for communication workflow

Documenting improvements in a prioritized action plan

Ensuring frequent stakeholder communication

The primary function of COBIT Implementation Phase 7 is to provide an opportunity for closing the loop for communication workflow, which means to ensure that the results and feedback of the implementation are reported and communicated to the relevant stakeholders, and that the lessons learned and best practices are captured and shared for future reference12.
References7 Phases in COBIT Implementation | COBIT Certification – SimplilearnCOBIT 2019 Design and Implementation COBIT Implementation, page 31.

QUESTION 22
Which of the following is MOST likely to cause an organization’s NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) implementation to fail?

Organizational training on the CSF is not provided.

Potential benefits of proposed improvements are not considered.

The implementation timeline is too long.

One of the most likely causes of an organization’s NIST CSF implementation failure is that the potential benefits of proposed improvements are not considered, which means that the organization does not conduct a cost-benefit analysis of the solutions to address the gaps between the current and target profiles. This can result in a lack of justification, prioritization, and alignment of the implementation plan with the organization’s mission drivers, risk appetite, and resource constraints12.
References7 Steps to Implement & Improve Cybersecurity with NIST3 Security Issues Overlooked By the NIST Framework

QUESTION 23
Which of the following functions provides foundational activities for the effective use of the Cybersecurity Framework?

Protect

Identify

Detect

The Identify function provides foundational activities for the effective use of the Cybersecurity Framework, because it assists in developing an organizational understanding of managing cybersecurity risk to systems, people, assets, data, and capabilities12. This understanding enables an organization to focus and prioritize its efforts, consistent with its risk management strategy and business needs12. The Identify function includes outcome categories such as Asset Management, Business Environment, Governance, Risk Assessment, Risk Management Strategy, and Supply Chain Risk Management12.
References: 1: The Five Functions | NIST 2: Getting Started with the NIST Cybersecurity Framework: A Quick Start Guide

QUESTION 24
Which of the following is a framework principle established by NIST as an initial framework consideration?

Avoiding business risks

Impact on global operations

Ensuring regulatory compliance

One of the framework principles established by NIST is to ensure that the framework is consistent and aligned with existing regulatory and legal requirements that are relevant to cybersecurity12.
References: 1: Cybersecurity Framework | NIST 2: Framework Documents | NIST

QUESTION 25
Which of the following should an organization review to gain a better understanding of the likelihood and impact of cybersecurity events?

Relevant internal or external capability benchmarks

Cybersecurity frameworks, standards, and guidelines

Cyber threat information from internal and external sources

According to the NIST Cybersecurity Framework, an organization should review cyber threat information from internal and external sources to gain a better understanding of the likelihood and impact of cybersecurity events. This information can help the organization to identify potential threats, vulnerabilities, and consequences, and to assess the current and target profiles of its cybersecurity posture12.
ReferencesIdentifying and Estimating Cybersecurity Risk for Enterprise Risk Management, page 19.COBIT VS NIST : A Comprehensive Analysis – ITSM Docs

QUESTION 26
During Step 3: Create a Current Profile, an enterprise outcome has reached a 95% subcategory maturity level.
How would this level of achievement be
described in the COBIT Performance Management Rating Scale?

Largely Achieved

Partially Achieved

Fully Achieved

According to the COBIT Performance Management Rating Scale, a subcategory maturity level of 95% corresponds to the rating of Fully Achieved, which means that the outcome is achieved above 85%12. This indicates that the enterprise has a high degree of capability and maturity in the subcategory, and that the practices and activities are performed consistently and effectively34.
References:
1: Performance Management of Processes – Testprep Training Tutorials
2: COBIT 2019 and COBIT 5 Comparison – ISACA
3: COBIT 2019 Performance Management: Principles and Processes
4: Effective Capability and Maturity Assessment Using COBIT 2019 – ISACA

QUESTION 27
Which of the following is an input to COBIT Implementation Phase 1: What Are the Drivers?

Risk response document

Current capability rating for selected processes

Program wake-up call

A program wake-up call is an input to COBIT Implementation Phase 1: What Are the Drivers, because it is a trigger event that creates a sense of urgency and a need for change in the organization’s governance and management of enterprise I&T12. A program wake-up call can be internal or external, positive or negative, such as a major incident, a new regulation, a strategic initiative, or a stakeholder feedback34.
References: 1: COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide 2: COBIT 2019 Implementation – ISACA 3: Tips for Implementing COBIT in a Continuously Changing Environment – ISACA 4: 7 Phases of COBIT Implementation: Explained – The Knowledge Academy

QUESTION 28
Which of the following is an objective of COBIT Implementation Phase 3-Where Do We Want to Be?

Identify critical processes or other components addressed in the improvement plan.

Determine the target capability for processes within governance and management

objectives.

Integrate the metrics for project performance and benefits realization.

This is an objective of COBIT Implementation Phase 3: Where Do We Want to Be?, because it involves defining the desired state of the enterprise’s governance and management system, based on the stakeholder needs, drivers, and scope12. This objective also includes using the COBIT Performance Management system to assess the current and target capability levels of the processes that support the governance and management objectives34.
References: 1: COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide 2: COBIT 2019 Implementation – ISACA 3: COBIT 2019 Performance Management: Principles and Processes 4: Effective Capability and Maturity Assessment Using COBIT 2019 – ISACA

QUESTION 29
An organization is concerned that there will be resistance in attempts to close gaps between the current and target profiles. Which of the following is the BEST approach to gain support for the process?

Implement organization-wide training on the CSF.

Communicate management opinions regarding the project.

Identify quick wins for implementation first.

Identifying quick wins for implementation first is the best approach to gain support for the process, as it can demonstrate the value and feasibility of the project, and motivate the stakeholders to overcome the resistance and embrace the change12. Quick wins are those actions that can be implemented rapidly and easily, and that can produce visible and measurable results3.
References7 Phases in COBIT Implementation | COBIT Certification – SimplilearnImplementing the NIST Cybersecurity Framework Using COBIT 2019, page 17.What is a Quick Win? – Definition from Techopedia

QUESTION 30
In which CSF step should an enterprise document its existing category and subcategory outcome achievements?

Step 1: Prioritize and Scope

Step 3: Create a Current Profile

Step 4: Conduct a Risk Assessment

This CSF step involves documenting the existing category and subcategory outcome achievements, by using the implementation status to indicate the degree to which the cybersecurity outcomes defined by the CSF Subcategories are currently being achieved by the organization12. The Current Profile reflects the current cybersecurity posture of the organization, and helps to identify the gaps and opportunities for improvement3 .
References: 1: Cybersecurity Framework Components | NIST 2: Cybersecurity Framework v1.1 – CSF Tools – Identity Digital 3: Implementing the NIST Cybersecurity Framework Using COBIT 2019 | ISACA : REVIEW OF IMPLEMENTING THE NIST CYBERSECURITY FRAMEWORK USING COBIT 2019.

QUESTION 31
Which role will benefit MOST from a better understanding of the current cybersecurity posture by applying the CSF?

Executives

Acquisition specialists

Legal experts

Executives are the role that will benefit most from a better understanding of the current cybersecurity posture by applying the CSF. This is because executives are responsible for setting the strategic direction, objectives, and priorities for the organization, as well as overseeing the allocation of resources and the management of risks1. By applying the CSF, executives can gain a comprehensive and consistent view of the cybersecurity risks and capabilities of the organization, and align them with the business goals and requirements2. The CSF can also help executives communicate and collaborate with other stakeholders, such as regulators, customers, suppliers, and partners, on cybersecurity issues3.
References: 1: Implementing the NIST Cybersecurity Framework Using COBIT 2019 | ISACA 2:
Cybersecurity Framework | NIST 3: Framework Documents | NIST

QUESTION 32
Which information should be collected for a Current Profile?

Implementation Status

Recommended Actions

Resource Required

The implementation status is the information that should be collected for a Current Profile, because it indicates the degree to which the cybersecurity outcomes defined by the CSF Subcategories are currently being achieved by the organization12. The implementation status can be expressed using a four-level scale: Not Performed, Partially Performed, Performed, and Informative References Not Applicable34.
References: 1: Cybersecurity Framework Components | NIST 2: Implementing the NIST Cybersecurity Framework Using COBIT 2019 | ISACA 3: Framework Documents | NIST 4: REVIEW OF IMPLEMENTING THE NIST CYBERSECURITY FRAMEWORK USING COBIT 2019.

QUESTION 33
During CSF life cycle action plan review, which of the following tasks is associated with realizing benefits?

Developing business cases indicating success factors

Monitoring performance against objectives

Documenting risk issues and remediation plans

According to the ISACA guide, monitoring performance against objectives is one of the tasks associated with realizing benefits, as it helps to measure the outcomes and value of the CSF implementation, and to identify and address any issues or gaps that may arise1. This task also involves reporting and communicating the results and feedback to the relevant stakeholders and ensuring continuous improvement2.
ReferencesConnecting COBIT 2019 to the NIST Cybersecurity Framework – ISACAManage Enterprise Cyberrisk by Applying the NIST CSF With COBIT … – ISACA

Loading …

NIST-COBIT-2019 Real Exam Questions and Answers FREE: https://www.2pass4sure.com/COBIT-Foundation/NIST-COBIT-2019-actual-exam-braindumps.html

[May 21, 2024] New Real 500-560 Exam Dumps Questions [Q18-Q35]

Verified OmniStudio-Consultant Dumps Q&As – OmniStudio-Consultant Test Engine with Correct Answers [Q62-Q81]

NIST-COBIT-2019 Practice Tests

Pass Your NIST-COBIT-2019 Exam Easily – Real NIST-COBIT-2019 Practice Dump Updated May 21, 2024 [Q14-Q35]
100% Real NIST-COBIT-2019 dumps – Brilliant NIST-COBIT-2019 Exam Questions PDF [Q23-Q41]

Related Certifications

CISA
NIST-COBIT-2019
COBIT-2019
CCAK
COBIT-Design-and-Implementation
AAIR
CGEIT

Pass Your NIST-COBIT-2019 Exam Easily – Real NIST-COBIT-2019 Practice Dump Updated May 21, 2024 [Q14-Q35]

Leave a Reply Cancel reply