100% Real NIST-COBIT-2019 dumps – Brilliant NIST-COBIT-2019 Exam Questions PDF [Q23-Q41]

NIST-COBIT-2019 ISACA

admin • June 20, 2024

100% Real NIST-COBIT-2019 dumps – Brilliant NIST-COBIT-2019 Exam Questions PDF [Q23-Q41]

Rate this post

100% Real NIST-COBIT-2019 dumps – Brilliant NIST-COBIT-2019 Exam Questions PDF

NIST-COBIT-2019 Exam PDF [2024] Tests Free Updated Today with Correct 50 Questions

NO.23 Which CSF step corresponds to the COBIT objective of knowledge and understanding of enterprise goals?

Step 1: Prioritize and Scope

Step 6: Determine, Analyze, and Prioritize Gaps

Step 4: Conduct a Risk Assessment

This CSF step corresponds to the COBIT objective of knowledge and understanding of enterprise goals, because it involves identifying the business drivers, mission, objectives, and risk appetite of the organization, as well as the scope and boundaries of the cybersecurity program12. This step helps to ensure that the cybersecurity activities and outcomes are aligned with the enterprise goals and strategy34.
References: 1: Cybersecurity Framework Components | NIST 2: Implementing the NIST Cybersecurity Framework Using COBIT 2019 | ISACA 3: COBIT 2019 Design and Implementation COBIT Implementation5 4: COBIT 2019 Foundation | Skillsoft Global Knowledge6

NO.24 Which of the following is MOST important for successful execution of CSF implementation Step 6 – Determine, Analyze, and Prioritize Gaps?

Have management review and approve the gap analysis.

Engage external experts to perform a cost-benefit analysis.

Engage business and IT process owners for internal expertise.

According to the ISACA guide, engaging business and IT process owners for internal expertise is most important for successful execution of CSF implementation Step 6, as they can provide valuable insights into the current and desired states of the processes, the gaps and potential solutions, and the costs and benefits of the implementation1. They can also help to align the cybersecurity program with the business objectives and risk appetite of the organization.
ReferencesImplementing the NIST Cybersecurity Framework Using COBIT 2019, page 17.

NO.25 When coordinating framework implementation, the business/process level collaborates with the implementation/operations level to:

develop the risk management framework.

assess changes in current and future risks.

create the framework profile.

According to the TM Forum’s Business Process Framework (eTOM), the business/process level is responsible for defining the business strategy, objectives, and requirements, as well as monitoring and controlling the performance and quality of the processes1. The implementation/operations level is responsible for designing, developing, and executing the processes that deliver and support the services1. When coordinating framework implementation, these two levels collaborate to assess changes in current and future risks, such as market trends, customer expectations, regulatory compliance, security threats, and operational issues2. This helps them to align the processes with the business goals and outcomes, and to identify and mitigate any potential gaps or challenges3.
References: 1: Process Framework (eTOM) – TM Forum 2: Implement Dynamics 365 with a process-focused approach 3: Operations Management Implementation – Smarter Solutions, Inc.

NO.26 What is the MOST important reason to compare framework profiles?

To improve security posture

To conduct a risk assessment

To identify gaps

The most important reason to compare framework profiles is to identify gaps between the current and target state of cybersecurity activities and outcomes, and to prioritize the actions needed to address them12.
Framework profiles are the alignment of the functions, categories, and subcategories of the NIST Cybersecurity Framework with the business requirements, risk tolerance, and resources of the organization3.
By comparing the current profile (what is being achieved) and the target profile (what is needed), an organization can assess its cybersecurity posture and develop a roadmap for improvement4.
References: 1: Cybersecurity Framework Components | NIST 2: Implementing the NIST Cybersecurity Framework Using COBIT 2019 | ISACA 3: Examples of Framework Profiles | NIST 4: Connecting COBIT
2019 to the NIST Cybersecurity Framework – ISACA

NO.27 Which of the following represents a best practice for completing CSF Step 3: Create a Current Profile?

Procuring solutions that are cost-effective and fit the organization’s technical architecture

Assessing current availability, performance, and capacity to create a baseline

Engaging in a dialogue and obtaining input to determine appropriate goals, tiers, and Activities

This represents a best practice for completing CSF Step 3: Create a Current Profile, because it involves collaborating with relevant stakeholders to identify the current cybersecurity outcomes and implementation status of the organization12. Engaging in a dialogue and obtaining input can help to ensure that the Current Profile reflects the business drivers, mission, objectives, and risk appetite of the organization, as well as the scope and boundaries of the cybersecurity program34.
References: 1: Cybersecurity Framework Components | NIST 2: Getting Started with the NIST Cybersecurity Framework: A Quick Start Guide3 3: Implementing the NIST Cybersecurity Framework Using COBIT 2019 | ISACA 4: NIST CSF: The seven-step cybersecurity framework process5

NO.28 Which of the following COBIT and NIST implementation steps may be reversed depending on the culture of the organization?

Step 4: Conduct a Risk Assessment and Step 6: Determine, Analyze, and Prioritize Gaps

Step 3: Create a Current Profile and Step 5: Create a Target Profile

Step 1: Prioritize and Scope and Step 2: Orient

According to the ISACA guide, the order of these two steps may be reversed depending on the culture of the organization and the level of stakeholder engagement1. Some organizations may prefer to start with a broad orientation of the NIST CSF and COBIT 2019 before scoping and prioritizing the implementation, while others may want to define the scope and priorities first and then orient the stakeholders accordingly.
ReferencesImplementing the NIST Cybersecurity Framework Using COBIT 2019, page 17.

NO.29 Within the CSF Core structure, which type of capability can be implemented to help practitioners recognize potential or realized risk to enterprise assets?

Protection capability

Response capability

Detection capability

The Detection capability is the type of capability within the CSF Core structure that can help practitioners recognize potential or realized risk to enterprise assets. The Detection capability consists of six categories that enable timely discovery of cybersecurity events, such as Anomalies and Events, Security Continuous Monitoring, and Detection Processes12.
References: 1: The Five Functions | NIST 2: Cybersecurity Framework | NIST

NO.30 Which of the following is associated with the “Detect” core function of the NIST Cybersecurity Framework?

Information Protection Processes and Procedures

Anomalies and Events

Risk Assessment

Anomalies and Events is one of the six categories within the Detect function of the NIST Cybersecurity Framework. The Anomalies and Events category aims to ensure that anomalous activity is detected in a timely manner and the potential impact of events is understood12.
References: 1: The Five Functions | NIST 2: Detect | NIST

NO.31 Which of the following functions provides foundational activities for the effective use of the Cybersecurity Framework?

Protect

Identify

Detect

The Identify function provides foundational activities for the effective use of the Cybersecurity Framework, because it assists in developing an organizational understanding of managing cybersecurity risk to systems, people, assets, data, and capabilities12. This understanding enables an organization to focus and prioritize its efforts, consistent with its risk management strategy and business needs12. The Identify function includes outcome categories such as Asset Management, Business Environment, Governance, Risk Assessment, Risk Management Strategy, and Supply Chain Risk Management12.
References: 1: The Five Functions | NIST 2: Getting Started with the NIST Cybersecurity Framework: A Quick Start Guide

NO.32 In which CSF step should an enterprise document its existing category and subcategory outcome achievements?

Step 1: Prioritize and Scope

Step 3: Create a Current Profile

Step 4: Conduct a Risk Assessment

This CSF step involves documenting the existing category and subcategory outcome achievements, by using the implementation status to indicate the degree to which the cybersecurity outcomes defined by the CSF Subcategories are currently being achieved by the organization12. The Current Profile reflects the current cybersecurity posture of the organization, and helps to identify the gaps and opportunities for improvement3 .
References: 1: Cybersecurity Framework Components | NIST 2: Cybersecurity Framework v1.1 – CSF Tools – Identity Digital 3: Implementing the NIST Cybersecurity Framework Using COBIT 2019 | ISACA : REVIEW OF IMPLEMENTING THE NIST CYBERSECURITY FRAMEWORK USING COBIT 2019.

NO.33 During the implementation of Step 2: Orient and Step 3: Create a Current Profile, the organization’s asset register should primarily align to:

organizational strategy.

configuration management.

the security business case.

The organization’s asset register should primarily align to configuration management, because it is a process that maintains an accurate and complete inventory of the organization’s I&T assets and their relationships12.
Configuration management supports the implementation of Step 2: Orient and Step 3: Create a Current Profile, because it helps to identify the systems, people, assets, data, and capabilities that are within the scope of the cybersecurity program, and to assess their current cybersecurity outcomes34.
References: 1: COBIT 2019 Framework – ITSM Docs – ITSM Documents & Templates 2: COBIT 2019 Design Guide: Designing an Information and Technology Governance Solution 3: Cybersecurity Framework Components | NIST 4: Implementing the NIST Cybersecurity Framework Using COBIT 2019 | ISACA

NO.34 During CSF implementation, when is an information security manager MOST likely to identify key enterprise and supporting alignment goals as previously understood?

CSF Steps 5: Create a Target Profile and 6: Determine, Analyze, and Prioritize Gaps

CSF Step 1: Prioritize and Scope

CSF Steps 2: Orient and 3: Create a Current Profile

This CSF step corresponds to the COBIT objective of knowledge and understanding of enterprise goals, because it involves identifying the business drivers, mission, objectives, and risk appetite of the organization, as well as the scope and boundaries of the cybersecurity program12. This step helps to ensure that the cybersecurity activities and outcomes are aligned with the enterprise goals and strategy34.
References: 1: Cybersecurity Framework Components | NIST 2: Implementing the NIST Cybersecurity Framework Using COBIT 2019 | ISACA 3: COBIT 2019 Design and Implementation COBIT Implementation
4: COBIT 2019 Foundation | Skillsoft Global Knowledge

NO.35 Which of the following is an objective of COBIT Implementation Phase 3-Where Do We Want to Be?

Identify critical processes or other components addressed in the improvement plan.

Determine the target capability for processes within governance and management

objectives.

Integrate the metrics for project performance and benefits realization.

This is an objective of COBIT Implementation Phase 3: Where Do We Want to Be?, because it involves defining the desired state of the enterprise’s governance and management system, based on the stakeholder needs, drivers, and scope12. This objective also includes using the COBIT Performance Management system to assess the current and target capability levels of the processes that support the governance and management objectives34.
References: 1: COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide 2: COBIT 2019 Implementation – ISACA 3: COBIT 2019 Performance Management: Principles and Processes 4: Effective Capability and Maturity Assessment Using COBIT 2019 – ISACA

NO.36 Which of the following is an input to COBIT Implementation Phase 1: What Are the Drivers?

Risk response document

Current capability rating for selected processes

Program wake-up call

A program wake-up call is an input to COBIT Implementation Phase 1: What Are the Drivers, because it is a trigger event that creates a sense of urgency and a need for change in the organization’s governance and management of enterprise I&T12. A program wake-up call can be internal or external, positive or negative, such as a major incident, a new regulation, a strategic initiative, or a stakeholder feedback34.
References: 1: COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide 2: COBIT 2019 Implementation – ISACA 3: Tips for Implementing COBIT in a Continuously Changing Environment – ISACA 4: 7 Phases of COBIT Implementation: Explained – The Knowledge Academy

NO.37 Which COBIT implementation phase directs the development of an action plan based on the outcomes described in the Target Profile?

Phase 3 -Where Do We Want to Be?

Phase 5 -How Do We Get There?

Phase 4 -What Needs to Be Done?

The COBIT implementation phase that directs the development of an action plan based on the outcomes described in the Target Profile is Phase 5 – How Do We Get There? This phase involves defining the detailed steps, resources, roles, and responsibilities for executing the implementation plan and achieving the desired outcomes12.
References7 Phases in COBIT Implementation | COBIT Certification – SimplilearnCOBIT 2019 Design and Implementation COBIT Implementation, page 31.

NO.38 Which of the following is an important consideration when defining the roadmap in COBIT Implementation Phase 3 – Where Do We Want to Be?

Agreed metrics for measuring outcomes

Reporting procedures and requirements

Change-enablement implications

An important consideration when defining the roadmap in COBIT Implementation Phase 3 is the change-enablement implications, which refer to the potential impact of the proposed solutions on the people, culture, and behavior of the organization. This involves assessing the readiness and willingness of the stakeholders to adopt the changes, identifying the risks and barriers to change, and developing strategies to address them12.
References7 Phases in COBIT Implementation | COBIT Certification – SimplilearnCOBIT 2019 Design and Implementation COBIT Implementation, page 31.

NO.39 How should gaps identified between the current and target profiles be addressed?

Comparing to and acting on the desired Tier level

With a full project engagement to close all gaps

Through a risk based-approach

According to the NIST Cybersecurity Framework, gaps identified between the current and target profiles should be addressed through a risk-based approach, which enables an organization to gauge the resources needed and prioritize the mitigation of gaps in a cost-effective manner. This approach also aligns the cybersecurity program with the business objectives and risk appetite of the organization12.
ReferencesExamples of Framework Profiles | NISTWhat is the NIST Cybersecurity Framework? | IBM

NO.40 Which of the following should be a PRIMARY consideration when creating an action plan to address gaps identified in CSF Step 6: Determine, Analyze, and Prioritize Gaps?

Mission drivers

Stakeholder map

IT process descriptions

According to the NIST Cybersecurity Framework, mission drivers are a primary consideration when creating an action plan to address gaps identified in CSF Step 6, as they help to align the cybersecurity program with the organization’s objectives, priorities, and risk appetite. Mission drivers also help to determine the resources needed and the cost-benefit analysis of the proposed solutions12.
References7 Steps to Implement & Improve Cybersecurity with NISTCybersecurity Framework v1.1 – CSF Tools – Identity Digital, page 7.

NO.41 During Step 3: Create a Current Profile, an enterprise outcome has reached a 95% subcategory maturity level.
How would this level of achievement be
described in the COBIT Performance Management Rating Scale?

Largely Achieved

Partially Achieved

Fully Achieved

According to the COBIT Performance Management Rating Scale, a subcategory maturity level of 95% corresponds to the rating of Fully Achieved, which means that the outcome is achieved above 85%12. This indicates that the enterprise has a high degree of capability and maturity in the subcategory, and that the practices and activities are performed consistently and effectively34.
References:
1: Performance Management of Processes – Testprep Training Tutorials
2: COBIT 2019 and COBIT 5 Comparison – ISACA
3: COBIT 2019 Performance Management: Principles and Processes
4: Effective Capability and Maturity Assessment Using COBIT 2019 – ISACA

Loading …

Verified & Correct NIST-COBIT-2019 Practice Test Reliable Source Jun 20, 2024 Updated: https://www.2pass4sure.com/COBIT-Foundation/NIST-COBIT-2019-actual-exam-braindumps.html

[Jun-2024] C-TFG61-2211 Exam Dumps Pass with Updated 2024 Certified Application Associate – SAP Fieldglass Services Procurement [Q28-Q50]

[Jun-2024] AZ-500 Free Sample Questions to Practice One Year Update [Q154-Q171]

NIST-COBIT-2019 Practice Tests

100% Real NIST-COBIT-2019 dumps – Brilliant NIST-COBIT-2019 Exam Questions PDF [Q23-Q41]
Pass Your NIST-COBIT-2019 Exam Easily – Real NIST-COBIT-2019 Practice Dump Updated May 21, 2024 [Q14-Q35]

Related Certifications

AAIR
COBIT-2019
CGEIT
NIST-COBIT-2019
CCAK
CISA
COBIT-Design-and-Implementation

100% Real NIST-COBIT-2019 dumps – Brilliant NIST-COBIT-2019 Exam Questions PDF [Q23-Q41]

Leave a Reply Cancel reply